Vince Sowerby Explores How Distracted Driving Relates to Negligence Per Se

Negligence Per Se is a law principle that simplifies the procedure of proving negligence in certain circumstances. Unlike general negligence claims, where individuals must establish the defendant's duty of care, breach, causation, and damages, negligence per se automatically presumes a duty and breach when specific legal violations occur.
In essence, negligence per se arises when a defendant violates a statute or regulation designed to ensure public safety, and that violation clearly causes harm to a person the law was meant to protect. This legal principle serves as a shortcut, allowing courts to focus on causation and damages rather than debating whether the defendant was at fault.
One of the most common examples of negligence per se is **driver distraction**, a behavior that has grown more common with the rise of smartphones and other distractions behind the wheel. Distracted driving laws, such as prohibitions against texting while driving, are designed to protect everyone on the road from preventable accidents. When someone violates these laws and causes an accident, they can be found automatically negligent.
### How Negligence Per Se Works
For negligence per se to apply, four elements must generally be met:
1. **The defendant broke a statute or regulation** – For instance, texting while driving violates laws in most states.
2. **The law was enacted to prevent the type of harm that occurred** – Texting bans are intended to reduce car accidents caused by driver inattention.
3. **The plaintiff was among the group of people the law was designed to protect** – Road users, including drivers, passengers, cyclists, and pedestrians, are intended beneficiaries of distracted driving laws.
4. **The statutory violation caused the plaintiff’s injury** – A direct connection must be established between the violation and the harm, such as a crash caused by a driver who was texting.
When these criteria are met, the legal system presumes the defendant was negligent. This means the plaintiff doesn’t need to prove the defendant's behavior was careless—only that it violated the law and resulted in harm.
### Distracted Driving as a Case Study
Imagine this scenario: A driver glances at their phone to read a text message, runs a red light, and collides with another vehicle. The driver violated a traffic law designed to prevent accidents, and their behavior directly caused harm. Under negligence per se, the injured party can argue that the statutory violation is enough to establish the driver’s negligence.
Watch Video
Comments
Post a Comment